Below are some fragments from the first section of Anne Waldman’s Outrider (Albuquerque: La Alameda Press, 2006). I love poetic manifestos, and I have just discovered an entire web archive of them. And someone at Western Michigan has excerpted portions of Olson’s 1950 manifesto Projective Verse for the sake of contemplation. We are contemplating Waldman.


Is poetry as profession in crisis? That’s the view of OUTRIDER. It’s a question. A view inside maker/marker/poetry inside a question.

What are thoughts? Where do they go? How do they form?

What are the portals, the ayatanas, for this poetry – head – restless – in – process – of – shaping – itself – through – language, wanting that to be enough for a whole life, yet troubled in “economy,” in “career,” in “maintenance,” in bad governance.

In obligatory rounds. In network with its participial “-ing.”


OUTRIDER seeks as view, this OUTRIDER motif, a way into the poet’s role in a creative world increasingly commodified. That sounds resoundingly glib. However.

Where did poetry start streaming in a poet? That would be a starter.

Write what you would want to read.

Utopian poetics, what you want to read.


Start with poem as career. Perhaps, ideally, where poetry presents, offers, little product value …It inculcates “a way into,” it is a process of becoming shapely of becoming mind / language / imagination / music shape-of – what form could that be, how might a semantics hold all this?

Historical precedence surely. OUTRIDER as a term, a concept, a battle cry (because one is a warrior in 1974) is born in 1974 at The Jack Kerouac School of Disembodied Poetics, Naropa Institute (later University). It’s a wild mind experiment.

How is the call heard? First it is heard. A line somewhere? Propensity. It is available, this view, this modus, in response and as an alternative to poetry as a career. Or of at least thinking of it that way. Operating in it – the composition by rhizome field – that way, as if poetry is an excursion and a necessity.


What is the sexuality of the poetics of OUTRIDER?

That’s just it. Invoking the notion of “coming out,” of being outed, of being outside the norm.

Recognizing the linear body, lunar body, illuminated body, liminal body. Body poetics.

Poet’s gift: Other.


One who rides outside the normative strategy, who will brook no obstacle to the next kinetic moment.


What OUTRIDER desires is a return to urgency for the work because we are trying to wake up the awareness of the world.

Not in a safer academy, although maybe help from there would come.


OUTRIDER will listen and keep a record, scribed indelibly in water in sand, in a saddlebag with items of regret.


A popular song with no closure is familiar to OUTRIDER.

OUTRIDER: At the cusp.


OUTRIDER is a witness and an animal-plant-mineral citizen, and strives to make change in the realm of inclusion, inasmuch as OUTRIDER can be persuasive, and inclusion might be a goal. Inclusion in what? The discourse.

In the Open.


OUTRIDER is a declension of possibility. OUTRIDER claims the source to be a way of regarding the terrain, thus a View.

OUTRIDER is a statement about language and its purpose.

And the cries of animals.

Not no ideas, but no ideas but in projectiles of things.


OUTRIDER is a documentarian. Old archivist of imagination.


OUTRIDER is One that rides.


OUTRIDER cannot consume its own theory.


The page becomes a terrain, an abode, a mystical site.


This entry was posted in Poetics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Outrider

  1. Pingback: Anne Waldman « Seminario Permanente de Teoría y Crítica

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s