Los médicos del anciano




Opthamologist Kathryn Najafi-Tagol, Eye Institute of Marin, 4000 Civic Center Dr., Ste. 200A, Sa Rafael, CA  94903, 415-444-0300, 415-444-0301. Reason: vision generally, and most specifically macular degeneration.

Audiologist Nancy Shane, shanen@maringeneral.org, cell 415 246 1353, direct 415 925 7220, fax 415 925 7979, 250 Bon Air Road, Greenbrae, CA 94905

Primary Alice Yee


– We should be in touch with Christina and Thanh about a transitional room at PCU. Christina 383 1600 x 242; Thanh 383 1600 x 319

– Mark is in charge of therapy, 328 7534

– Carol Arbizu is the acting director of nursing, 383 1600 x 337 (there is also Gemma)

– Charge nurses are at 383 1600 x 234, 235, 236

– Karen Nunn is at 383 1600 x 238 and 272 2721 on cell

– Doctors in the healthcare unit are John Fullerton and http://www.hamptonhealthltd.com/ … and the dedicated doctor, whose full name I did not catch completely (Kemnitz?). We should work to get care coordinated. (To this end we will need to find names of all doctors Dad was working with before, GP Dr. Yee, cardiologist at Marin General, his dermatologist, his allergist and his opthamologist; opthamology is particularly important since reading is so important, and missing the eyedrop doses means inching toward blindness).

Appointments are, or include the audiology one January 9th at 2:45. Persephonie needs the telephone numbers of everyone. One January 9th, he should be there with insurance documents; it is on the second floor, next to admissions. Vision appointments are January 5th at 11 AM and January 16th at 10:15.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Los apuntes

El proyecto más amplio:
+ reading of race in discurso letrado:
– there are all these short-circuits
– particularly before 1930, before mestizaje paradigm was consolidated
– against Doris Sommer’s happier vision
Questions for this proyecto amplio:
– why the short-circuits (the evoke and elide)
– why the need for strategies of denial (which mestizaje paradigm was used for)
– why the ambivalence (this will be juxtaposition)
This paper:
– da Silva: useful because global (against L.A. exceptionalism)
– super-useful to me because evoke-and-elide
So the books I am working with:
– use evoke-and-elide to create the Latin American subject
– have to use it because identification of that subject (European/indigenous) is unstable
– are also juxtaposing different discourses (Hooker)
From these books I get legitimacy to discuss:
– white supremacy, because it is global (da Silva)
– Latin America in a hemispheric frame, because both Latin American and US thinkers did

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Spanish women poets of the 20s and 30s

I have photocopies of the first chapter or two of Catherine Bellver’s excellent book, that I am recycling because I keep forgetting that I have them–and do not seem to be reading the poets in question. They are listed here and I have asked to library to acquire the whole book.

Posted in Feminism, Identity, Poetics, Spain, Subject Theory, Vanguardias | Tagged | Leave a comment

Racial memory and literary history

This is a piece, surely very conservative, by Greenblatt that I want to read. The entire issue of the journal is interesting, too.

The May 2016 issue of PMLA has an article on Jean Franco by Arturo Arias, “From the Cold War to the Cruelty of Violence: Jean Franco’s Critical Trajectory from The Decline and Fall of the Lettered City to Cruel Modernity” that is very useful. Some key ideas from it are:

– The coup against Arbenz as the most important event in 20th century U.S.-Latin American relations (Grandin)- Franco as a Latin American intellectual, ahead of her time in the U.S. and European contexts
* In Latin America the indigenous subject is the privileged interlocutor of the West, and a Western subject of African descent is not.

There is a great deal more in this piece. The idea of “cruel modernity” has appeared elsewhere (e.g. in Pankaj Mishra’s new book) and it is different from earlier critiques of the Enlightenment.

Posted in Race | Leave a comment

Unas revistas importantes

Revista Iberoamericana 221 (Oct.-Dec. 2007) is entirely available online so I am leaving my beautiful paper copy in this café because I do not recognize the issue when it sits on my shelf. It is on literature and technology but the articles are on topics like photographic desire in Lugones’ short stories, the photographic image between the aura and the questioning of identity, and radio and the avant-garde, which I love and which, of course, quotes Vallejo. There are also reviews of Raúl Bueno’s book on Cornejo Polar and Silvio Torres-Saillant’s intellectual history of the Caribbean, so all in all it is an issue I should read with joy in its beautiful paper entirety–but I am doing things another way.

Revista Iberoamericana 194-195 (January-June 2001) is another issue I kept, but am giving up. There is much in it of value but I had kept it for an article (pp. 191-200) called “Escribir el sujeto anómalo. (Des)leer El negrero de Novás Calvo.” I’ve torn this article out, as though it were an offprint, so I can file it more visibly, read it, study it, it is important.

The January 2016 PMLA is another journal issue of good general interest, that I have kept for the sake of a translation of Nebrija and a fascinating forum post. I will save these.

Posted in Hispanism, Identity, Race, Spanish, Subject Theory, Vallejo, Vanguardias | Leave a comment

On the speaking subject

I have had this offprint for 26 years and now it is available on JSTOR. Nancy Fraser, “The uses and abuses of French discourse theories for feminist politics,” is an important article. It was important for me and will be, as it helps me to understand things I never did and articulates intuitions I had.

It is hard to let the offprint go but I am doing it as a part of clutter reduction. I will remember the piece, though.

Posted in Identity, Modernities, Philosophy and Theory, Poetics, Postmodernism, Vallejo, Vanguardias | Leave a comment

Themes and ideas for that class

It is exoticism, primitivism, representations and uses of the savage and the jungle, and indigenismos, and lo indígena.

I thought of giving a class on these themes again because I ran across some material on Quintín Lame, and I am thinking about the idea of Latin America, and Latin America as “entre-lugar,” and the way in which it produces itself as mestizo or hybrid.

Here is a talk on representing the Other. Here is Enrique Dussell talking about the location of Latin American culture.

There is the question of time. Time and the Other, and the idea in Los pasos perdidos that all times are mixed in Latin America. Dussell points out that the idea of the ancient, medieval and modern worlds doesn’t work anyway and is an invention of the Romantics.

There is Vasconcelos talking about the superiority of the tropics, which goes precisely with the prologue to REM.

There is the rethinking of mestizaje (note that Bolívar did not say we had to fuse, he said we were mixed and had to get along). There is race as a hybrid term. There is the current discussion, popular among students, about pinning down definitions for “Hispanic” and “Latino.”

There is Clorinda Matto, and all kinds of people who work with the other. El otro, el mismo, looking for self through other. (I am not sure yet whether or how I will do this.) I was thinking of El hablador as well.

Posted in Colonialisms, What Is A Scholar?, Working | Leave a comment